=============== Browser Widgets =============== Formlib defines widgets: views on bound schema fields. Many of these are straightforward. For instance, see the `TextWidget` in textwidgets.py, which is a subclass of BrowserWidget in widget.py. It is registered as an `IBrowserRequest` view of an `ITextLine` schema field, providing the `IInputWidget` interface:: The widget then receives the field and the request as arguments to the factory (i.e., the `TextWidget` class). Some widgets in formlib extend this pattern. The widget registration is extended for `Choice` fields and for the `collection` fields. Default Choice Field Widget Registration and Lookup =================================================== All field widgets are obtained by looking up a browser `IInputWidget` or `IDisplayWidget` view for the field object. For `Choice` fields, the default registered widget defers all of its behavior to the result of another lookup: a browser widget view for the field *and* the Choice field's vocabulary. This allows registration of Choice widgets that differ on the basis of the vocabulary type. For example, a widget for a vocabulary of images might have a significantly different user interface than a widget for a vocabulary of words. A dynamic vocabulary might implement `IIterableVocabulary` if its contents are below a certain length, but not implement the marker "iterable" interface if the number of possible values is above the threshhold. This also means that choice widget factories are called with with an additional argument. Rather than being called with the field and the request as arguments, choice widgets receive the field, vocabulary, and request as arguments. Some `Choice` widgets may also need to provide a source interface, particularly if the vocabulary is too big to iterate over. Default Collection Field Widget Registration and Lookup ======================================================= The default configured lookup for collection fields -- List, Tuple, and Set, for instance -- begins with the usual lookup for a browser widget view for the field object. This widget defers its display to the result of another lookup: a browser widget view registered for the field and the field's `value_type` (the type of the contained values). This allows registrations for collection widgets that differ on the basis of the members -- a widget for entering a list of text strings might differ significantly from a widget for entering a list of dates...or even a list of choices, as discussed below. This registration pattern has three implications that should be highlighted. * First, collection fields that do not specify a `value_type` probably cannot have a reasonable widget. * Second, collection widgets that wish to be the default widget for a collection with any `value_type` should be registered for the collection field and a generic value_type: the `IField` interface. Do not register the generic widget for the collection field only or you will break the lookup behavior as described here. * Third, like choice widget factories, sequence widget factories (classes or functions) take three arguments. Typical sequence widgets receive the field, the `value_type`, and the request as arguments. Collections of Choices ---------------------- If a collection field's `value_type` is a `Choice` field, the second widget again defers its behavior, this time to a third lookup based on the collection field and the choice's vocabulary. This means that a widget for a list of large image choices can be different than a widget for a list of small image choices (with a different vocabulary interface), different from a widget for a list of keyword choices, and different from a set of keyword choices. Some advanced applications may wish to do a further lookup on the basis of the unique attribute of the collection field--perhaps looking up a named view with a "unique" or "lenient" token depending on the field's value, but this is not enabled in the default Zope 3 configuration. Registering Widgets for a New Collection Field Type --------------------------------------------------- Because of this lookup pattern, basic widget registrations for new field types must follow a recipe. For example, a developer may introduce a new Bag field type for simple shopping cart functionality and wishes to add widgets for it within the default Zope 3 collection widget registration. The bag widgets should be registered something like this. The only hard requirement is that the developer must register the bag + choice widget: the widget is just the factory for the third dispatch as described above, so the developer can use the already implemented widgets listed below:: Beyond this, the developer may also have a generic bag widget she wishes to register. This might look something like this, assuming there's a `BagSequenceWidget` available in this package:: Then any widgets for the bag and a vocabulary would be registered according to this general pattern, in which `IIterableVocabulary` would be the interface of any appropriate vocabulary and `BagWidget` is some appropriate widget:: Choice widgets and the missing value ==================================== Choice widgets for a non-required field include a "no value" item to allow for not selecting any value at all. This value used to be omitted for required fields on the assumption that the widget should avoid invalid input from the start. However, if the context object doesn't yet have a field value set and there's no default value, a dropdown widget would have to select an arbitrary value due to the way it is displayed in the browser. This way, the field would always validate, but possibly with a value the user never chose consciously. Starting with version zope.app.form 3.6.0, dropdown widgets for required fields display a "no value" item even for required fields if an arbitrary value would have to be selected by the widget otherwise. To switch the old behaviour back on for backwards compatibility, do zope.formlib.itemswidgets.EXPLICIT_EMPTY_SELECTION = False during application start-up.